Vident Partners provides vetted investment banking expert witnesses for cases involving fairness opinions, sell-side process, adviser conflicts, underwriting duties and merger disputes. Request a referral today.
Find a Investment Banking Expert →Overview
An investment banking expert decides whether an adviser ran a deal the way a competent banker would have: how the sale process was designed, how the valuation was built and presented, how conflicts were handled and whether the board got what it needed. Disputes usually follow a sale of a company, a public offering or a failed transaction. This page covers banker conduct and deal practice. Valuing a company belongs to a business valuation expert, deal mechanics generally to a mergers and acquisitions expert, and fraud in a stock offering to a securities expert.
The expert reads engagement letters, board books, fairness presentations, bidder logs, fee letters, internal emails and proxy statements. Comparing the internal drafts of a valuation with the version shown to the board is often the most telling step.
The best-known example of adviser liability is the Rural/Metro litigation. The Delaware Court of Chancery held RBC Capital Markets liable for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty by the board 1. In a later settled order, the SEC said RBC rendered a fairness opinion to the board that contained materially false and misleading information concerning its valuation analysis, and that the information was included in the proxy statement 2. The SEC also described RBC's fee structure: advisory fees that included a fee for issuing a fairness opinion and a success fee if a sale closed, along with the right to offer staple financing to bidders, which offered the chance of more lucrative fees 2. It said the court found that valuation information was provided only three hours before the board met to approve the merger, and was the first such information the board had requested and received during the sale process 2.
The lessons translate directly into expert work. Did the banker disclose its financing interests? When did the board first see valuation work? Did inputs change near the end, and did anyone say why? An expert compares the method used with practice at comparable banks and asks whether adjustments had a reasoned basis.
Process cases ask how a target was marketed. Who was contacted, how long did it take and what was the plan for strategic and financial buyers? A banker's practice is to widen or narrow the field for reasons that should be in the record. The expert reads the process letters, contact logs and board minutes, and says whether the conduct fit what a careful adviser does in a similar deal. Whether directors breached a duty is for the court, and an expert should stop short of that conclusion.
Going-private deals bring a federal disclosure rule. Under Item 1015 of Regulation M-A, a filing must state whether the subject company or an affiliate has received any report, opinion or appraisal from an outside party materially related to the transaction, and describe the preparer and a summary 3. So banker work may become public, and any difference between that summary and the internal work can be tested.
Public offerings bring other duties. Section 11 of the Securities Act reaches every underwriter with respect to a security, and gives a defense for parts of a registration statement not made on the authority of an expert if, after reasonable investigation, the defendant had reasonable ground to believe the statements were true 4. So an underwriting expert reads the due diligence file: management sessions, comfort letters, customer calls and how red flags were handled. Rule 10b-5 also prohibits any device, scheme or artifice to defraud and acts that operate as a fraud or deceit 5, which can apply to statements in a deal.
Look for a former managing director with direct experience on the same type of deal, size and industry. Securities licenses and registration history matter, and a career record should be checked against the claimed experience. A person who did only large-cap public mergers may not fit a middle-market sale. Pair this expert with a valuation expert on the number and a damages expert on the loss.
The SEC said RBC rendered a fairness opinion to the board that contained materially false and misleading information concerning its valuation analysis.
Case Types
Fairness opinion disputes
Sell-side process and conflicts of interest
Banker aiding and abetting claims
Success fee and engagement letter disputes
Failed merger and broken deal claims
Underwriter due diligence under Section 11
Stapled financing conflicts
Going-private disclosure disputes
Qualifications
Related Specialties
FAQ
Look for a former managing director with direct experience on the same type of deal, size and industry. Check the registration history against the claimed experience.
In the Rural/Metro litigation, the Delaware Court of Chancery held RBC liable for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty by the board. The facts of each deal control.
Conflicts, late or unexplained changes in inputs and a gap between internal work and what the board saw. The expert compares drafts and asks whether changes had a reasoned basis.
It is financing that a sell-side adviser offers to potential bidders. The SEC order in the RBC matter said this offered the possibility of more lucrative fees than advisory fees, which raises a conflict question.
Section 11 gives a defense for parts of a registration statement not made on an expert's authority if, after reasonable investigation, the defendant had reasonable ground to believe the statements were true. The diligence file shows what was done.
In general, investment banking expert fees are determined by the expert themselves, based on a variety of criteria. Among those criteria are experience, the size of the transaction, the volume of deal documents and the amount of testimony. Vident does have some influence over expert fees by comparing experts within a specialty, but ultimately it is a personal decision by the expert.
Related Insights
In January we posted a summary review of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) baby powder litigation. A striking new development warrants an update: Judge Christopher Lopez of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for...
Practice Area IntelligenceMedicare and Medicaid fraud represent a significant challenge to the financial integrity of the United States healthcare system. The real cost of such fraudulent activities is multifaceted,...
Practice Area IntelligenceAccountants play a key role in litigation by providing a range of specialized services that can support the legal process. Their expertise in financial matters allows them to offer insights and...
Sources
Vident Partners connects attorneys with qualified investment banking expert witnesses. Complimentary consultation, 24-hour turnaround, no obligation.
Request an Expert →