Vident Partners provides vetted drone expert witnesses for cases involving small unmanned aircraft crashes and injuries, FAA Part 107 compliance, flight log and telemetry analysis, remote identification, privacy and trespass, and commercial drone operations nationwide. Request a referral today.
Find a Drones Expert →Overview
A drone expert answers what the aircraft did, who was responsible for it, and whether that person met the FAA's rules. A drone case often has rich data. The flight controller, the app, the handset and the airframe may hold a detailed track of the flight. This page covers small unmanned aircraft. Manned aviation has its own page, and data recovery from a damaged device may need a digital forensics examiner.
Commercial small drone operations are governed by 14 CFR Part 107, and those rules supply clear benchmarks.
Responsibility sits with one person. The remote pilot in command is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of the small unmanned aircraft system 1. That person must ensure the aircraft will pose no undue hazard to other people, other aircraft or other property in the event of a loss of control for any reason 1. That last clause matters most, because it requires planning for failure. A motor failure or a lost link is therefore not an automatic defense.
The other limits are specific:
A remote pilot in command must report to the FAA, no later than 10 calendar days after, any operation involving at least serious injury to any person or any loss of consciousness, or property damage other than to the drone unless a listed condition applies 6. A missing report may raise a question about conduct, and a filed one may contain admissions. Counsel should request it.
The investigation usually begins with the logs. An expert seeks the aircraft's onboard records, the controller and app files, any cloud records, video, and the battery's history. Together they may show position, altitude, control inputs, signal strength, battery level, and warnings shown to the pilot. Some data is proprietary or encrypted, and some is overwritten, so preservation should come first and the aircraft should not be powered on casually.
Remote identification may add another source. The FAA describes Remote ID as the ability of a drone in flight to provide identification and location information that can be received by other parties through a broadcast signal 7. Where a broadcast was recorded, it can help identify an operator, including for a drone that was never recovered.
The usual failure questions are mechanical and human: propeller or motor failure, battery depletion, compass or GPS error, flyaways, loss of link and pilot input. An expert separates a true malfunction from an error that looks like one, since a lost link may have triggered a return-to-home that flew into a structure.
The FAA has proposed a rule for normalizing Beyond Visual Line of Sight operations, with requirements for operations, manufacturing, separation from other aircraft, authorization, security and record keeping 8. A company's waiver or authorization should be read for the date in question, and the current status of the rule should be confirmed, because it may change what counts as ordinary practice.
Drone disputes also include privacy, trespass and nuisance, usually under state law, and products claims against a manufacturer. Insurance coverage can be a separate question. Non-commercial flyers operate under different rules from Part 107, so the type of operation is an early issue.
Look for a certificated remote pilot with commercial operations experience and direct knowledge of the airframe type. Former FAA staff can address compliance. An aerospace or electrical engineer addresses failure of the airframe, motors or software. A digital forensics examiner addresses data extraction. A biomechanical engineer addresses injury from a blade or an impact.
Under 14 CFR 107.19, the remote pilot in command must ensure the drone will pose no undue hazard to people, aircraft or property in the event of a loss of control for any reason.
Case Types
Bystander injuries from drone crashes or propellers
Collisions with aircraft, vehicles, or structures
Part 107 violations and enforcement disputes
Lost link and flyaway events
Commercial inspection, delivery, and agricultural operations
Product defect claims against drone makers
Privacy, trespass, and nuisance disputes
Insurance coverage for drone losses
Qualifications
Related Specialties
FAQ
Look for a certificated remote pilot with commercial experience and direct knowledge of the airframe at issue, or former FAA staff for compliance questions. For a failure claim, add an aerospace or electrical engineer. Ask how the expert extracted and validated the flight logs.
Under 14 CFR 107.19, the remote pilot in command is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation. The pilot must ensure the aircraft will pose no undue hazard in the event of a loss of control for any reason. An employer or manufacturer may also face claims under state law.
Under 14 CFR 107.51, a small unmanned aircraft cannot be higher than 400 feet above ground level, unless flown within a 400-foot radius of a structure and no higher than 400 feet above its uppermost limit. Groundspeed may not exceed 87 knots, or 100 miles per hour.
A remote pilot in command must report, no later than 10 calendar days after, an operation involving at least serious injury to any person or any loss of consciousness, or property damage other than to the drone unless a listed condition applies.
It varies by model. An expert seeks onboard records, controller and app files, cloud records, video, and battery history, which may show position, altitude, control inputs, and warnings. Some data is proprietary or overwritten, so preservation should come first.
In general, drone expert fees are determined by the expert themselves, based on a variety of criteria. Among those criteria are flight experience, forensic experience, engineering background, the need for testing, and publications. Vident does have some influence over expert fees by comparing experts within a specialty, but ultimately it is a personal decision by the expert.
Related Insights
I would have thought the answer was Yes – and not just because I’m in the expert referral business. But I’ve just learned that, in point of fact, the answer is a resounding No. In Laccetti v. Ellis,...
Research BriefingThis recently-filed sexual assault case resonates, for three reasons: the event occurred on an airplane, which, while not unheard-of and certainly underreported, is relatively rare (see...
Sources
Vident Partners connects attorneys with qualified drones expert witnesses. Complimentary consultation, 24-hour turnaround, no obligation.
Request an Expert →