Vident Partners provides vetted consumer product expert witnesses for cases involving household product injuries, CPSC reporting and recall duties, substantial product hazards, children's product testing and certification, incident data analysis, and regulatory compliance nationwide. Request a referral today.
Find a Consumer Products Expert →Overview
A consumer products expert answers what the seller knew about a hazard, when it knew, and whether it met its federal duties to test, report and recall. The product claim itself belongs to product liability counsel and a design engineer. This page covers the regulatory layer around the product: the Consumer Product Safety Commission's rules, a company's reporting clock, and the incident records that show what was known.
The statute reaches further than many expect. A consumer product is any article, or component part, produced or distributed for sale to a consumer for use in or around a household or residence, a school, in recreation, or otherwise 1. The definition then carves out some categories, so the first step is confirming that the Commission has jurisdiction over the item at all 1. Motor vehicle equipment, for instance, is left out of the reporting section and sits with NHTSA 2.
Section 15 of the Consumer Product Safety Act is often the most important law in the case, and it binds more than the maker. Every manufacturer, distributor and retailer who obtains information which reasonably supports the conclusion that a product fails to comply with a rule, contains a defect that could create a substantial product hazard, or creates an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death, must inform the Commission 2. A substantial product hazard means a failure to comply that creates a substantial risk of injury to the public, or a product defect that creates one because of the pattern of defect, the number of products distributed, the severity of the risk, or other factors 2.
The clock is short. CPSC's rule says a firm may investigate reportability, but that this evaluation should not exceed 10 days unless the firm can show a longer period is reasonable, and that at the end of 10 days the firm is deemed to have received and considered what it would have with reasonable care 3. After that, the report is due immediately, which the rule defines as within 24 hours 3.
That timing drives the document review. An expert builds a chronology from customer complaints, warranty returns, retailer reports, testing, engineering changes, insurer notices and internal email, and then asks when the information reasonably supported the conclusion. Complaint counts on their own do not answer the question. The analysis needs the denominators too: units sold, how long they were in use, and how the reported failures compare.
The product may be subject to a mandatory rule, or only to a voluntary standard. The difference matters, because the Act treats a failure to meet a mandatory rule as a defined trigger, and also refers to voluntary consumer product safety standards on which the Commission has relied 2. Children's products have an added layer. Before distributing a children's product covered by a safety rule, a manufacturer must submit samples to an accredited third party conformity assessment body and, based on that testing, issue a certificate 4. An expert can review the test reports, the sample selection and whether the production unit matched the tested one.
Counsel often reaches for CPSC's public database of reports of harm. Use it carefully. The statute requires the Commission to tell users that it does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the database's contents 5. Reports can show that others were hurt, but admissibility and similarity to the case are separate issues, and an expert should explain how reports were screened.
The Act does offer its own damages action. A person injured by a knowing or willful violation of a consumer product safety rule, or any other rule or order issued by the Commission, may sue in federal court and recover damages, and the court may award costs and attorney's fees where it finds that in the interest of justice 6. Whether a failure to report supports such a claim is a contested legal question that varies by court. In most cases, the regulatory record instead serves as evidence in a state product liability or negligence case, for notice, and possibly for punitive damages where the law allows.
No license applies. Strong witnesses are former CPSC staff, or compliance and product safety leaders from manufacturers or retailers who have run recall and reporting decisions. Separate the roles: a regulatory expert addresses the timing and adequacy of company conduct. A design or mechanical engineer addresses the defect. A human factors expert addresses use, and a warnings expert addresses the label. A statistician can test the incident data.
CPSC's rule says a firm's investigation of reportability should not exceed 10 days unless a longer period is shown to be reasonable, and that a report is then due immediately, which means within 24 hours.
Case Types
Failure to report a substantial product hazard to CPSC
Delayed, narrow, or ineffective recalls
Household appliance, furniture, and tip-over injuries
Children's products, toys, and third party testing disputes
Fires and burns from batteries, heaters, and electrical products
Retailer and importer liability for unsafe goods
Disputes over incident data and prior similar claims
Notice and punitive damages evidence in product liability suits
Qualifications
Related Specialties
FAQ
Look for former CPSC staff, or a compliance or product safety leader who has made reporting and recall decisions at a manufacturer, importer, or retailer. The expert should be able to read complaint and warranty data with the right denominators. For the defect itself, retain an engineer.
A manufacturer, distributor, or retailer must inform the Commission when it obtains information that reasonably supports the conclusion that a product fails to comply with a rule, contains a defect that could create a substantial product hazard, or creates an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death. CPSC's rule says the report is due immediately, meaning within 24 hours, and that a firm's evaluation should not exceed 10 days unless a longer period is shown to be reasonable.
Under 15 U.S.C. 2064, it means a failure to comply with a rule that creates a substantial risk of injury to the public, or a product defect that creates such a risk because of the pattern of defect, the number of products distributed, the severity of the risk, or other factors.
Section 2072 allows a person injured by a knowing or willful violation of a consumer product safety rule, or any other rule or order of the Commission, to sue in federal court and recover damages. Whether a particular violation qualifies is a legal question for counsel. Many injury cases instead proceed under state product liability law.
They are a lead, not proof. The statute requires the Commission to tell users that it does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the database contents. An expert should explain how reports were screened for similarity, and counsel should address admissibility under the forum's rules.
In general, consumer product expert fees are determined by the expert themselves, based on a variety of criteria. Among those criteria are regulatory experience, forensic experience, product category knowledge, the volume of records, and publications. Vident does have some influence over expert fees by comparing experts within a specialty, but ultimately it is a personal decision by the expert.
Related Insights
This question was recently answered in the affirmative by California’s intermediate court of appeals in Bolger v. Amazon.com (4th App. Dist., Div. One, 8/13/2020),...
Case AnalysisThere’s real consumer fraud, and there’s imaginary consumer fraud. Becerra v. Dr Pepper/Seven Up, http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2019/12/30/18-16721_.pdf (9th Cir. 12/30/19), is a...
Sources
Vident Partners connects attorneys with qualified consumer products expert witnesses. Complimentary consultation, 24-hour turnaround, no obligation.
Request an Expert →