Vident Partners provides vetted orthodontics expert witnesses for cases involving root resorption, periodontal damage during braces, failed treatment, clear aligners, informed consent and pediatric treatment planning. Request a referral today.
Find a Orthodontics Expert →Overview
An orthodontics expert decides whether tooth movement was planned, consented to and monitored the way a reasonably careful provider would have done it, and whether a bad result was a recognized risk or a preventable one. Treatment runs for years, so a claim often depends on a long chain of records and on whether anyone stopped to look at what was changing. This page covers braces, aligners and growth-related treatment. Gum disease itself belongs to a periodontics expert, jaw surgery to an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, and general restorative work to a dentistry expert.
The expert reads the initial records, photographs, panoramic and cephalometric films, treatment plans, progress notes, retainers and appliance records, referral letters and consent forms. Comparing the first and last images, and any taken in the middle, is usually the heart of the review.
A survey-and-case study of United States orthodontic liability offers a useful frame. Among orthodontists who responded, 9.1 percent reported a claim, with periodontal issues making up most of those claims 1. The authors reported that negligence was the main reason for clinically related suits, and failure to obtain proper informed consent the main cause of action for non-clinical suits 1. The survey had only 77 respondents, so its percentages are a rough signal.
Other work points the same way. A review describes a Korean study in which the primary causes of disputes were dissatisfaction with treatment results at 18.6 percent, followed by root resorptions at 9.7 percent and pulp necrosis at 8.3 percent 2. An Israeli study identified 35 closed claims involving orthodontic treatment with periodontal damage, and found mean treatment time of 3.2 years, with 64 percent treated for 3 years or more 3. Long treatment means more time for a problem to grow unnoticed, and more opportunities to catch it.
Clear aligners add questions of supervision. Who examined the patient? Who reviewed the plan the software proposed? Were X-rays taken and read? Were periodontal disease and failing restorations ruled out before starting? A company or provider that relies on photographs and scans has to show that the examination was adequate. State dental boards decide who may provide this care and how, so the local rule is read first. Product claims about an appliance are a separate matter, and FDA regulates orthodontic devices as dental devices 4.
Consent carries particular weight, and many patients are minors, so a parent's understanding matters. Risks such as resorption, decalcification, relapse and a longer treatment time should be explained and documented. Survey respondents ranked good doctor-patient communication as the most relevant factor in both causing and mitigating claims 1. A form helps, but the chart should show an actual discussion, particularly when the plan changes.
Look for a licensed dentist with specialty training in orthodontics who is in active practice at the time of the events and has treated similar cases. The American Board of Orthodontics provides certification 5, and it is a useful credential. If the defendant is a general dentist doing orthodontics or a remote aligner provider, ask what the forum requires of an expert on that standard of care.
A study of United States orthodontic liability reported failure to obtain proper informed consent as the main cause of action for non-clinically related litigation.
Case Types
Root resorption during braces
Periodontal damage during treatment
Failed or incomplete treatment results
Clear aligner and remote treatment claims
Informed consent for minors and adults
Relapse and retainer disputes
Decalcification and tooth damage
Failure to refer for surgery or gum care
Qualifications
Related Specialties
FAQ
Look for a licensed dentist with specialty training in orthodontics and active practice at the time of the events. American Board of Orthodontics certification is a useful credential. Ask about experience with the appliance at issue.
Not by itself. It can occur during treatment. The questions are whether films were taken at reasonable intervals, whether shortening was noticed and whether the plan changed.
Published work points to periodontal problems, dissatisfaction with results, root resorption and informed consent. Communication is often the common thread, and a provider who promised a specific result may face a contract claim as well.
State dental boards decide who may provide this care and how, so the local rule comes first. The expert asks who examined the patient, who reviewed the plan and whether X-rays and gum health were checked.
A parent or guardian generally consents under state law. The record should show the risks explained, including resorption, decalcification and relapse, along with any later change in the plan.
In general, orthodontics expert fees are determined by the expert themselves, based on a variety of criteria. Among those criteria are experience, the length of treatment, the number of records and images, the appliance involved and the amount of testimony. Vident does have some influence over expert fees by comparing experts within a specialty, but ultimately it is a personal decision by the expert.
Related Insights
Most of us have signed a hospital consent form without reading every word. A recent Vermont Supreme Court decision, Ford v. Polomsky, shows what can happen when a patient later says, "I never agreed t...
Practice Area IntelligenceOver the past several years I have reviewed medical charts for both insurance companies and pain clinics to determine if what has been recorded makes good medical sense and shows an appropriate level...
Research BriefingFentanyl, a synthetic opioid, was first developed by Dr. Paul Janssen in the 1960s. From its inception, it was designed to be fast-acting, highly potent, and more readily synthesized than naturally oc...
Sources
Vident Partners connects attorneys with qualified orthodontics expert witnesses. Complimentary consultation, 24-hour turnaround, no obligation.
Request an Expert →